Law Offices of Paul R. Bartleson 1007 7th Street Suite 214 Sacramento, CA 95814 916.447.6640 Bankruptcy 916.447.6640
HOME
ELIGIBILITY
MEANS TEST
BANKRUPTCY ALTERNATIVES
FORECLOSURE
LOAN MODIFICATIONS
LOAN MOD FRAUD
BANKRUPTCY 101
CHAPTER 7
CHAPTER 13
CHAPTER 11
TAXES
STUDENT LOANS
GLOSSARY
LINKS/RESOURCES
BANKRUPTCY MYTHS
POST BANKRUPTCY


STUDENT LOANS

If you are having trouble with a student loan, the best thing to do is to first contact your lender and try to rework the loan. You can get some general information on cancelling your student loan on information contained at the Department of Education, Federal Student Loan website: Department of Education.

As a general rule, however, student loans are not dischargeable in a Bankruptcy Proceeding under Bankruptcy Code sec. 523 (a) (8).

The general rule is that Student Loans are not dischargeable, unless you can show “undue hardship.” Following the Amendments to the Bankruptcy Code effective October 17, 2005, Bankruptcy Code sec. 523 (a) provides

“A discharge under section 727, 1141, 1228(a), or 1328(b) of this title does not discharge an individual debtor from any debt (8)unless exception such debt from discharge under this paragraph would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor's dependents, for . . . (B) any other eeducational loan that is a qualified education loan as defined in section 221 (d) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, incurred by a debtor who is an individual...”.

The meaning of “undue hardship” is not defined in the Bankruptcy Code. There does not appear to be any controlling law in the 9thCircuit. However, other jurisdictions that have addressed the issue such as the 6th Circuit, have adopted the so-called Brunner test for determining whether the repayment of a student loan would impose an undue hardship on a debtor. Oyler v. Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. (In re Oyler), 397 F.3d 382 (6th Cir. 2005); see Brunner v. New York State Higher Educ. Serv. Corp., 831 F.2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987).

As summarized by the court, the Brunner test requires a three-part showing by the debtor:

1) that the debtor cannot maintain, based on current income and expenses a “minimal” standard of living for herself and her dependents if forced to repay the loans;
(2) that additional circumstances exist indicating that this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period of the student loans; and
(3) that the debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans.

Fields v. Sallie Mae Serv. Corp. (In re Fields), 326 B.R. 676, 681 (B.A.P. 6th Cir. 2005) (quoting
Miller v. Pa. Higher Educ. Assistance Agency (In re Miller) , 377 F.3d 616, 623 (6th Cir. 2004)).


To obtain a discharge of student loans, a debtor must show by a preponderance of the evidence that
he has satisfied all three prongs of the Brunner test. In re Miller, 377 F.3d at 623.

With an uncertain economy and industries where debtors are becoming unemployable, this is likely to be hot subject of litigation in the Bankruptcy Court, to be determined on a case by case basis.

 











Law Offices of Paul R. Bartleson

1007 7th Street, Suite 202,

Sacramento, CA 95814

Ph. (916) 447-6640

E-mail Us

 
Law Offices of Paul R. Bartleson
1007 7th Street, Suite 202, Sacramento, CA 95814. Ph. (916) 447-6640
© Copyright 2010. All Rights Reserved.
Home Eligibility RequirementsAlternatives to Filing What Happens When Your Lender Forecloses
Bankruptcy 101Chapter 7Chapter 13Chapter 11
Glossary Links/ResourcesBankruptcy MythsLawyer JokesAbout UsE-mail Us